The King Of The Israelites - 1312 Words

he conquest of the Israelites spread like a lightning bolt. All the countries that lived within the boundaries of the Promised Land were in utter fear for their lives. Kings who had strong fortified cities within massive stone walls trembled as the stories flooded in telling them how easily Israel fought and defeated everyone in their path. Kings everywhere came together in a united effort to stop God s people from entering into their country. Instead their defiance of God s will was met with utter devastation. No one could stand up to the power behind the Israelite army. Israel held tightly to the Laws of Moses doing everything commanded. Because of each man s faithfulness a supernatural ability took over each fighting soldier giving them the ability to stand and defeat a thousand men. Leviticus 26:78, You will be victorious over your enemies; five of you will be able to defeat a hundred, and a hundred will be able to defeat ten thousand. Every promise in the Law was fulfilled because the Israelites made a conscious effort to remember the Laws and apply them to their lives. Their faithfulness to God s words empowered the Spiritual forces of the unseen heavenly kingdom and the Spirits of God ran to protect every soldier from harm while enabling them to defeat every person who tried to come up against them. Hebrews 1: 14, What are the angels, then? They are spirits who serve God and are sent by him to help those who are to receive salvation. Conquering theShow MoreRelatedWar, Disobedience And Provision From Judges And Carries Them Forward Through God1305 Words   |  6 Pagestheir oppressors despite Israel’s continued disobedience. Through his provision of the judges, victories and kings, God displayed his omnipotence over the Israelites. Since these themes are carried over throughout Judges and 1 Samuel, God is shown to be the same God over his people. From the start of Judges, war is a prevalent theme. This theme is present in the first verse when the Israelites asked, â€Å"Who shall go†¦ against the Canaanites to fight against them?† Time and time again the Lord raised upRead MoreBiblical Story Of The Israelites988 Words   |  4 Pagescomplex and deeply embedded principals that can be useful in our current context. One of the key principals that has developed throughout the biblical story of the Israelites is the love that God continued to pour out on them even through their temptation and rebellion. We shall explore this principal through the history of the Israelites and what this principal means to us today. Body Genesis tells us that ‘in the beginning God created the heavens and earth’ and then informs us of the beginningRead MoreThe Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Jr.728 Words   |  3 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. gives this speech on September 28, 1965. This time period was the heart of the Civil Rights movement in America. Slaves received their freedom at the end of the Civil War, in 1865. However, the battle for former slaves did not end there. While they may have earned their freedom, there was still a long road ahead to achieving equality. Martin Luther King Jr., was a Civil Rights activist and speaker. In this speech, he talked not only about what has been accomplished, but aboutRead MoreThe Ancient Greeks And Ancient Hebrews1553 Words   |  7 Pageswhich tell many battle stories of the Greeks and Hebrews. To start off, we must talk about the ancient Greeks. As it was made known earlier, the Greeks believed in multiple gods. Each god played a different role in overseeing the world. Zeus was the king of the gods, ruling over Mount Olympus. His wife and sister was Hera, the queen of the gods, along with being the goddess of marriage, women, and other things. Along with these two, there were many more gods portrayed and discussed about in the IliadRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Judges 1298 Words   |  6 Pages The book of Judges is a very structured literary piece that uses chronological structure to make a point and emphasize an idea. Judges narrates the Israelites continual decline in morality and their downward spiral away from God, through the accounts of the judges, minor judges, and individuals. While many people use the book of judges to teach courage and strength, it would be more accurately described as a book of brokenness and terror. The book of Judges begins with a prologue. The prologueRead MoreTypes Of Government That Deuteronomistic Historians Should Write About The Israelite Nation1164 Words   |  5 Pageswrite about the Israelite nation. To understand the theory we need to apprehend what is the Deuteronomistic History’s main belief. The strongest belief was that when Israel is faithful, it prospers, but when unfaithful, it is cursed with defeat, disaster, and exile from their land. First, the earlier form of government was the confederation of the Israelite tribes. The Israelites believe that they could what they believe was right and worship just Yahweh. â€Å"11Then the Israelites did what was evilRead MoreThe Testament Of The Old Testament1331 Words   |  6 Pagestell the history of the Israelite people. This section includes the books of Judges, Kings, and Esther. The third section, the wisdom books, contain ideals on morality and guidance on how the Israelites should live their life. Finally, the Prophetic books, the fourth section, is composed of the writings of the prophets, God’s messengers, to Israel. Inside each section of the Old Testament, however, each book follows the life of a different person and story of the Israelite people. Some books inRead MoreThe Creation Of The World1206 Words   |  5 Pageshappy and want to return. Though the Israelites were assured by Joseph that â€Å"God will surely take care of [them]† (Exodus 13:19). The Israelites said that they would rather serve the Egyptians than die in the wilderness, but again they were assured that â€Å"The Lord will fight for [them]† (Exodus 14:14). After the Israelites crossed the Red Sea and Pharaoh’s horses and chariots came after them, â€Å"the Lord made the waters of the sea low back upon them, though the Israelites walked on dry land though the midstRead MoreCultural Attitudes Reflected In War. Vanissa Tsang. . Conflict1670 Words   |  7 Pagesinevitable when rules have been dismissed or violated, or when something valuable has been stolen or damaged. The Israelites got involved with a n internal war when Saul became jealous of David for being the Lord’s next chosen king; The Trojan War happened because Paris took Helen from Menelaus. Although war is a common form of conflict for the Israelites and Greeks, its objective differs by Israelites fight to gain God’s favor, or power, whereas Greeks roots from the honor of one self, legacy of the familyRead MoreBiblical Eras Of Creation, The Patriarchs, And The Ketuvim1540 Words   |  7 Pagesintroduces Israelite Moses, who killed an Egyptian for beating a Hebrew slave, fled to Midian, and encountered God in a burning a bush where God called Moses to free the Israelites in Exodus 3:10, â€Å"I am sending you to the king of Egypt so you can lead my people out of his country.† Moses’s brother, Aaron, joined him in his quest to convince the king to free his people, but the king ignored Moses’s demands from God and ten plagues came down on Egypt, which only affected non-Israelites. The fi nal plague

Ecological Integrity At Risk for the Cadron Creek...

The Cadron Creek watershed covers approximately 775 square miles and is composed mostly of forests (48%) and grassland (37%). However, a pending permit, AR0052086C, would allow a centralized waste treatment facility to discharge, recycled fracking fluid waste waters into an unnamed tributary located within the Cadron Creek watershed. This unnamed tributary flows directly into Linn Creek, which would then feed into the north fork of the Cadron and eventually into the Arkansas river (ADEQ 2013). The Cadron Creek, located within the Arkansas river basin, is listed by the US Army Corps of Engineers as an extraordinary resource water body or ERWB (USACE 2013). ERWBs are important, because they satisfy a broad range of socio-economic, cultural,†¦show more content†¦Headwater streams are of particular interest, because they have much smaller catchment sizes in relation to larger rivers and thus are more readily altered by land transformations (Meyer 2007). Land transformation as a result of anthropogenic effects continues to be one of the biggest threats to the ecological integrity of headwater streams today. Land transformation induced by human alterations to the landscape, have been shown to have negative impacts on habitat, water quality, and the biota of natural waterways (Allan 2004). For instance, in 2004 Gage found that macro invertebrates were negatively impacted by anthropogenic mediated land use, which often lead to declines and even eliminations of sensitive taxa from the stream (Gage et. al. 2004). Urbanization is considered to be one of the driving forces behind land transformation and is mainly responsible for increases in impervious surface area. Increases in impervious surface area have led to the rapid conveyance of storm waters, resulting in the increased presence of oils, metals, and road salts within surface waters (Moore et. al. 2005). The increased presence of these solutes are leading to variations in ionic concentrations that deviate from natural concentrations, thus altering the conductivity within the water systems. Conductivity is the measure of the ability of water to pass an electrical

International Human Rights Free Essays

ABSTRACT: Armed conflict, either internationally or internally, has caused great sufferings to the victims and society as a whole. It constitutes a situation where the rule of law is absent and human rights are no longer respected. Even though various preventive endeavours have been campaigned and implemented by the international community, the occurrences of armed conflicts are still inevitable due to political fluxes and fractions or disputes over power, which proved that preventive measures alone are not enough. We will write a custom essay sample on International Human Rights or any similar topic only for you Order Now This grave situation calls for the role of transitional justice to tackle the repercussions of armed conflicts in post conflicts situations, which in the long run can enhance the preventive measures in preventing the re-occurrences of armed conflict. However, the implementation of transitional justice in post conflict situations showed to be problematic due to various factors. The most prominent factor that impedes the implementation of transitional justice is the preference of States in applying realpolitik and amnesty laws to perpetrators of gross human rights violations in order to gain political stability. In responding to this problem, it is of the opinion of this thesis that under international law, accountability for gross human rights violations should remain to be the main purpose of transitional justice in implementing its approaches to establish justice and peace in post conflict situations. Based on that point of view, this thesis is aimed to discuss the implementation of transitional justice in post conflict situations in general. Firstly, it will discuss the implementation of transitional justice approaches over the history to come to terms with past atrocities and to establish a new starting ground for society in post conflict situations. Secondly, the thesis will also hold a discussion about transitional justice under the framework of international law, especially on the relation between the concept with international human rights law, international humanitarian law and international criminal law. Lastly, this thesis will use a study case from Indonesia concerning post conflict situations in Aceh and Papua after the downfall of the New Order regime in 1998 as a testing ground to apply the analyses on transitional justice approaches under the framework of international law and to asses the problems occurred in implementing transitional justice approaches in Aceh and Papua. How to cite International Human Rights, Papers

Meursault By Albert Camus Essay Example For Students

Meursault By Albert Camus Essay Testing the Boundaries of Algerian Conventional Society In this essay, I amgoing to explore Albert Camus use of Meursaults murder trial in TheStranger to note the absurdity of the defined social behavior in Algeria whileforcing the reader to evaluate his or her own morality. Camus asks the reader toform a mental and emotional relationship with Meursault through the descriptiveand, in the end, destructively honest narrative. He then asks the reader todepend not on the law, which in this novel represents conventional socialbehavior, but on this newfound relationship to decide Meursault fate. Camusintroduction of Meursault uses straightforward and very honest language. Whilethe reader is aware from the beginning that Meursault deviates from the norm,through factual, and almost play-by-play details, Meursault dares the reader tojudge him, and we do. We criticize him for not showing more emotion towards hismothers death. We expect him to show more affection towards Marie, whom heclaims to love and we want him to exert a more forceful voice in the situationbetween Raymond and his girlfriend. However, we respect his honesty andappreciate his need to almost separate himself from the emotions that seem todrive us all a little crazy. Camus then challenges this respect and appreciationwith a violent act. As the story reaches the climax with the murder, ouropinions of Meursault change because, as Camus makes us aware, society hascondemned him not for murder but for being different. Indeed, the gentlemen ofthe jury will take note of the fact. And they will conclude that a stranger mayoffer a cup of coffee, but that beside the body of the one who brought him intothe world, a son should have refused it. (91) Meursaults guilt, as theprosecutor points out, stems from his odd behavior over the loss of his mother. Unlike American society, although not by much, the Algerian social standardscall for Meursault to weep in sorrow and be distraught during the funeraldespite his relationship with his mother. As part of American society, weattempt to create our own meaning for Meursaults actions. We want hisrelationship with his mother to explain these actions. On the other hand,perhaps, we want to say that he was taught not to show is emotions.American society searches for the psychological reasons for Meursaultsactions. Our focus is not on the murder per say. It is on the reasons behind themurder. What made him snap? However, we must separate ourselves from whatAmerican society has taught us and focus only on what Camus tries to teach usabout Algerian society. Algerian society is about getting to the core ofMeursaults defiance not because it will help to better explain his actions,but because when one defies the rules of society he, or she, must pay. The trialis not a murder trial. It is a trial of morals and emotion. Why else would theprosecutor focus so much on the death of Meursaults mother? Why else wouldthe later part of the book turn into a self-evaluation of Meursault and ofourselves? During the preparation for the trial, the reader becomes increasinglyaware of Meursaults sensitivity. Meursault has to explain his feelings andnot his actions to the court, something that seems impossible for even the mostsocially acceptable. We feel pity for him because his past torments him. Camususes this pity for Meursault. He wants the reader to identify with Meursault andsympathize with his situation. Once Camus sets up the link between the readerand Meursault, he makes the reader resent the judges. Camus provokes the readerto resent the judges of Meursault by having us feel that the judges arequestioning our behavior as well. This resentment towards the judges, andultimately towards society, becomes the basis for our decision to either supportor condemn Meursault. Camus forces the r eader to revaluate his or her morals inorder to avoid condemnation by society. We envy Meursault because he is able tobe honest and true to himself, and although Meursault could have saved himselfhad he repented or showed remorse, he saves himself by not doing that, and thisis what we respect because Meursault has done what we are afraid of doing: hequestions society. Let us look at the actual murder. Meursault, in what seems tobe an act of pure evil, fires an involuntary shot followed by four voluntaryones. The four voluntary and unnecessary shots start Meursaults process ofquestioning society, and the readers process of questioning him or her self. .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 , .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .postImageUrl , .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 , .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1:hover , .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1:visited , .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1:active { border:0!important; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1:active , .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1 .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u1985e6c12d3207b91ed2a92dab85a9d1:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Parliament and the High Court EssayAs the judges connect Meursaults emotionless past to his crime, the readerexplores exactly how they are like Meursault. Camus wants the reader to feelthat at any moment society can condemn him or her in the same way that Meursaultis condemned. This is not to say, however, that Camus want us to forget aboutthe violent murder. Rather, Camus intentionally disassociates the act of themurder from the actual sentence. This separation reveals the absurdity ofAlgerian, and in many ways American society. Camus needs the reader to believethat the court kills Meursault for his indifference, in order for the reader tofeel unsatisfied with the verdict . Because we see Meursault as an innocentforce, almost child like, we begin to question our own innocence. And yet, weare, because of societys conditioning, unable to separate the murder from theverdict. The reader, like the judges, begins to prosecute Meursault for opposingsociety, and uses the murder to justify this prosecution. Camus then, after thereader feels satisfied with not having defied society, uses Meursaults momentof self-evaluation to make the reader self-evaluate himself. On page 121,Meursault asks, What did other peoples deaths or a mothers love matter tome; what did his God of the lives people choose of the fate they think theyelect matter to me when were all elected the same fate, me and billions ofprivileged people like him who also called themselves my brothers? What wouldit matter if he were accused of murder and then executed because he did not cryat his mothers funeral? Meursaults newfound awareness compels the readerto ask: in what way am I Meursault? Am I gu ilty of being different?How will I act when a parent passes away? In prosecuting Meursault, thereaders prosecute themselves. Camus forces us to make a connection that isentirely different, better yet, independent of societys connection to murderand guilt. Camus has the reader put Meursault on trial to determine his owninnocence. The Stranger, and ultimately the murder trial, is a process ofself-awareness based not on what society has taught us, but on what Camusteaches us through Meursaults situation. Through this self-awareness, Camusis able to provide a valid argument against the absurdity of what society callsappropriate behavior. We see that there is no such thing as appropriatebehavior because in the end, society condemns us all. The reader becomesMeursaults source of strength, Camus source of truth, and societys judges.